 |
| |

 |
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
No.78 July 1, 2004 |
 |
 |
|
New Methodology to Select
Projects in Public and Public Utility Service Operations |
|
 |
 |
 |
| Ryoichi YAMAGISHI |
 |
 |
In recent years, moves at assessing
performance by means other than financial indexes have been spreading primarily
within central and local government offices and agencies. However, in introducing
performance evaluation systems, focus is now being given to accountability and
organizational evaluations. Efforts to accumulate experience as objective data
and use that data to improve operations as well as operational efficiency have
not necessarily been stressed.
By focusing on the aspect of "accumulating
experience as objective data and using the data to improve operations as well
as operational efficiency" in developing performance evaluation systems, Nomura
Research Institute (NRI) has developed two methods of objective project selection
and has been introducing these methods in actual operations. The two methods
are project selection to achieve goals at minimum cost and project selection
within a finite cost.
These two methods are used to select
which of ten or more candidate projects of several totally different types are
to be actually implemented. In both of these methods, projects are selected by
a two-step process: (a) evaluating each candidate project through certain procedures
and (b) selecting the projects to be implemented in accordance with prescribed
logic. The principal feature of these methods is that selection of the projects
to be implemented can be based on evaluations from totally different aspects
that are suitable for individual projects of totally different types.
This paper uses several cases to briefly
introduce the logic portion applied to the project selection in particular from
among the overall project selection procedures.
Contents
| I |
Conventional Project Selection
Relying on Precedents |
| II |
Past Approaches to Performance Evaluation
that Presented Weaknesses in Operational Improvement |
| III |
Individual Project Effects and Combination
of Projects to Achieve All Goals |
| IV |
Selecting Projects within a Limited Budget |
| V |
Expanding Fields of Application |
 |
 |
GO to PDF |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|  |