 |
| |

 |
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
No.71 December
1, 2003 |
 |
 |
|
Using
the Balanced Scorecard in Reforming Corporate Management Systems |
|
 |
 |
 |
| Toru MORISAWA
and Hiroshi KUROSAKI |
 |
 |
In recent years, using the balanced
scorecard (BSC) methodology, a system which enables organizations to measure
and manage corporate performance, has been rapidly attracting a great deal of
attention in Japan as in other countries. However, not all Japanese companies
have achieved success in introducing this technique. According to a questionnaire
survey conducted by the Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. (NRI) in June 2003, about
one-third of the 35 companies that responded to questions about the introduction
of the BSC approach reported that they felt "Dissatisfied, as it left much to
be desired." Therefore, unless appropriate measures are taken to correct these
deficiencies, the concept may simply collapse under the weight of a growing number
of failed cases in Japan and be regarded in the future as little more than a
passing fad. As identified in the survey, the major requirements for the successful
introduction of the BSC methodology can be summarized in the following areas:
(1) clarifying the objectives for its introduction; (2) securing a firm commitment
by top management for its introduction; (3) increasing the level of the understanding
in organizations in which the BSC is introduced; (4) fostering BSC experts both
in organizations where it is introduced and the BSC implementation office; and
(5) especially in the early stages of its introduction, requiring that such leadership
sections not give up the operating reins. In order to achieve success in introducing
the BSC methodology and to enable it to fully display its effects in creating
corporate value, it is necessary to do away with the current preoccupation with
the idea of "budgetary supremacy" in such analyses. Indeed, the BBM concept (i.e.,
beyond budgeting model) being advocated as the new approach to corporate management
in Europe transcends the conventional framework of budgetary management systems,
and we believe this approach will further accelerate the trend towards value-based
management in Japan.
Contents
| I |
The Balanced
Scorecard Boom |
| |
1 |
Framework of Performance
Measurement and Management |
| |
2 |
Status of Introducing the BSC at
Japanese Companies |
| II |
Is Success Being Achieved
Through the Introduction of the BSC? |
| III |
Five Decisive Measures
in Success or Failure |
| |
1 |
Clarifying the Purpose of the Introduction |
| |
2 |
Commitment by Top Executives to the
Introduction of the BSC |
| |
3 |
Increasing Awareness and Understanding
of Organizations Where the BSC is to be Introduced |
| |
4 |
Fostering BSC Experts at Both the
BSC Implementation Office and the Organizations in Which the
BSC Will Be Introduced |
| |
5 |
Requiring the BSC Implementation
Office Not to Give Up the Operating Reins (Especially in the
Early Stages of Its Introduction) |
| IV |
Budgetary Supremacy that
Prevents Value Creation by BSC |
| |
1 |
Too Much Weight on Financial Viewpoints |
| |
2 |
Relationship Between Budget, Performance
Projections and Performance Evaluation Standards |
| |
3 |
Three Steps to Overcoming the Current
Status |
| |
4 |
New Trends from Europe |
| V |
Metrics, BSC and Beyond
Budgeting Model |
 |
 |
GO to PDF |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|  |